Skip to main content

GEOMETRY x ANCIENT GREECE

This is the seventh (and penultimate!) in a series of posts in which I will attempt to demonstrate critical reflection with respect to different aspects of life as a teacher.  This post aims to explore how I might leverage my current and potential interdisciplinary professional connections to provide interdisciplinary learning opportunities for my students.

I made this (link to full-size original):
The above map shows the interdisciplanary professional contacts with whom I could potentially engage for an interdisciplinary purpose.  I can't say that I'm currently engaging any of these contacts for that purpose, although I regularly engage with many on professional and/or social levels!

I am really interested in the potential for e-learning to facilitate interdisciplinary learning, and being in a high school I have fantastic contacts in the form of teachers in other departments, teaching the same BYOD class.  I'd love to be engaging with contacts in other schools and industries, but I feel that to begin with it is wise to keep it small and local.  Plus, the ease of regular communication, common goals (student achievement), and physical space fit well with ACRLog's model (2015).

For now, I have outlined a hypothetical plan for collaborating with a social studies teacher to deliver a combined maths/social studies unit such as 'GEOMETRY x ANCIENT GREECE'.

Who
Annie (Social Sciences)
How
We have a few common non-contacts, and we’re both usually at school about an hour early, so this time could be used to plan, make decisions, and set goals.  It would also require the buy-in and endorsement of our respective HODs, with allowances for some flexibility in time and content.
Possible common goals
         Engage students in meaningful learning
         Offer opportunity for enrichment (shared class is top stream)
         Contribute to individual inquiry projects (e-learning and enrichment, respectively)

Potential Challenges:
  • misalignment of unit scheduling between departments
  • difficulties establishing meaningful links between curricula in the two learning areas
  • maintaining integrity of teaching and learning with relation to respective curricula
  • convincing our superiors that the hassle is worthwhile!
Potential Benefits:
  • rich learning experience for students (ThomasMcDonaghGroup, 2011)
  • bountiful opportunities for students to be the creators of resources - challenging deep thinking
  • charting a path for more inter-department collaboration in the future
Ultimately, I'm concerned that connections between curricula in a combined endeavour such as this would be contrived and shallow (Hardre, et al, 2013).  Further, I'm intimidated by the amount out work that would be required!  However, I genuinely believe in the potential benefits, and I know that early stages [of the BYOD programme] can be the best time to introduce new ways of doing things.

References


ACRLog. (2015). A Conceptual Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Retrieved from http://acrlog.org/2015/05/14/a-conceptual-model-for-interdisciplinary-collaboration

Hardré, P. L., Ling, C., Shehab, R. L., Nanny, M. A., Nollert, M. U., Refai, H., ... & Wollega, E. D. (2013). Teachers in an Interdisciplinary Learning Community Engaging, Integrating, and Strengthening K-12 Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 409-425.

ThomasMcDonaghGroup. (2011, May 13). Interdisciplinarity and Innovation Education. [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDdNzftkIpA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Responsive Curricula

This is the third in a series of posts in which I will attempt to demonstrate critical reflection with respect to different aspects of life as a teacher.  This post aims to analyse the issue of unresponsive curricula as a barrier to learning,  then to critique and evaluate practice in the context of different audiences (local, national and/or international) and their perspectives. If the reports by the US National Intelligence Council (2012) and KPMG (2014) are to be believed, poverty is set to decline as globalisation sets in and we, as a global community, advance .  While this may be the case globally, I have my doubts about whether we will experience the same shift here in New Zealand.  My skeptical tone stems from our currently increasing inequality; the widening gap between the 'haves' and 'have nots' (Rashbrooke, 2013).  I choose this trend to analyse as a flow-on from last week's post , wherein I identified issues affecting my practice arising from s...

Facebook Groups: Worth the risk?

This is the fifth in a series of posts in which I will attempt to demonstrate critical reflection with respect to different aspects of life as a teacher.  This post aims to explore ethics related to digital/online access and activity within the context of fusing acebook groups for the purpose of organising school sports teams. Facebook groups are widely used at my school to communicate with students and parents, as we often struggle through either traditional methods (e.g. daily notices), or more 21st century methods (e.g. email), and the majority of our students are active on Facebook. Hall (2001, p.5) proposes a guide for ethical decision-making which I will utilise, alongside the Education Council's Code of Ethics for Certificated Teachers (2017).  There are many questions to be asked!  But for the purpose of the exercise I will dig into issues of privacy . What is the problem? Opening up an online, public, forum challenges the teachers' ability to protect ...

Collegial Improvement

This is the second in a series of posts in which I will attempt to demonstrate critical reflection with respect to different aspects of life as a teacher.  This post aims to critically analyse issues of socioeconomic factors, school culture and professional environments in relation to my practice.  I will avoid discussing the decile system, only using it as basis for inference regarding the living situations of students at my school. My school is rated as decile 3.  At the time of writing I didn't have access to data regarding the different factors in decile ranking.  However, I can infer from this ranking and the insight I have that a significant number of our students: live in households with income in the lowest 20% nationally have parents in occupations at skill levels 4 or 5 live in households with an equivalised crowding index greater than one have parents with no tertiary or school qualifications have parents who received some form of benefit (Mini...